Andre J. Cronthall

Print PDF

Partner  

Andre J. Cronthall is a partner in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles office.

Areas of Practice

Mr. Cronthall is a trial lawyer specializing in complex commercial litigation and has extensive experience as lead counsel in civil jury trials involving a wide variety of business disputes. He has litigated numerous matters from inception through appeal, with expertise in insurance-related litigation, products liability, commercial contract disputes and professional liability.

Education

  • J.D., University of Southern California, 1984, Director, Hale Moot Court honor's program, Founder and co-chairman, USC Chapter of the Federalist Society
  • B.S., University of Southern California, 1981

Admissions

  • State Courts and all Federal District Courts in California
  • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Mr. Cronthall has been lead trial counsel in numerous trials in state and federal courts.  A representative sample of trials include:

Bonded Motors v. State Compensation Insurance Fund - Los Angeles Superior Court - obtained favorable result after seven week jury trial involving alleged bad faith and unfair business practices involving state's largest workers' compensation insurer.

Geosource, Inc. v. The Hartford - Los Angeles Superior Court - obtained defense verdict in lawsuit involving an insurer's right to control the settlement of disputes.

Hinduja v. ARCO - Los Angeles Superior Court - Obtained defense verdict after jury trial in case involving claims of unfair business practices, violations of franchise laws and discrimination. Handled appeal, which resulted in affirmance of verdict, and judgment for attorney's fees incurred by client.

Mouradian v. Central National Life Insurance Company - Los Angeles Superior Court - obtained defense judgment after jury trial in bad faith case arising out of insurer's rescission of policy due to misrepresentations by insured.

Scott's Creations, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London - Los Angeles Superior Court - obtained defense verdict by proving that claimed armed theft of wholesale jeweler's inventory was a staged crime. Selected as one of the top ten defense verdicts of 2006.

Tricor v. State Compensation Insurance Fund - Los Angeles Superior Court - obtained favorable verdict in action involving the workers’ compensation system, and regulation of the industry.

United Pacific v. Cohanim - Los Angeles Superior Court - obtained judgment for insurer in insurance coverage matter involving limits of liability.

The Walton Companies v. Etiwanda Estates - San Bernardino Superior Court - obtained defense verdict in lawsuit involving construction of a residential development.

Wolfe Air Aviation v. Andreini & Co., et al - Los Angeles Superior Court (transferred to Orange County Superior Court for trial) - obtained $10 million jury verdict and judgment for client in case involving cancellation of aviation insurance policy. Amount of judgment was almost double the amount of damages calculated by
client's expert witness.

Representative Appellate Experience

Rail Services v. State Compensation Insurance Fund – California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District – 2003 Cal. App. Lexis 1032 (2003) – Obtained published decision in case of first impression concerning an insurer's right to collect a nonrefundable deposit premium.

Wolfe Air Aviation v. Andreini & Co., et al – California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District (App. No. B151940) – Represented aerial photography and film production studio at trial (see above) and on appeal. Appellate court affirmed judgment in its entirety.

The Gillette Company v. 99 Cent Only Stores – California Court of Appeal Second Appellate District (App. No.B156193) – Represented plaintiff and obtained writ of mandamus ordering trial court to vacate summary adjudication order.

Gordon's Cabinet Shop v. State Compensation Insurance Fund – California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District – 74 Cal. App. 4th 33 (1999) – Obtained published decision affirming judgment of dismissal in favor of client and discussing when the five year statute for bringing a case to trial may be tolled.

Advanced Building Maintenance v. State Compensation Insurance Fund - California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District – 49 Cal. App. 4th 1388 (1996) – Obtained reversal of trial court order and reinstatement of judgment in favor of client. Published opinion discusses the timing of motions to vacate judgments.

Red Alarm, Inc. v. Waycrosse, Inc. et al – United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit – 47 F. 3rd 999 (1995) – Obtained published opinion affirming summary judgment in favor of client, discussing principles of accord and satisfaction.

Honors

  • One of Mr. Cronthall's numerous trial victories was recognized by the Daily Journal as one of the top ten defense verdicts of 2006

Memberships

  • Member, Los Angeles County Bar Association
  • Member, American Bar Association
  • Member, American Board of Trial Advocates
  • Member, Board of Governors of the Association of Business Trial Lawyers, two terms
  • Member, State Bar's Insurance Law Committee