Del Mar
T: 858.720.7446
F: 858.847.4883

Industries

Education

  • J.D., University of San Diego, 2002, magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, San Diego Law Review
  • B.S. Electrical Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1999
  • California
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • United States Patent and Trademark Office
Overview
Experience
Publications & News
Memberships

Martin Bader is a partner in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm's San Diego/Del Mar office.

Areas of Practice

Mr. Bader is an intellectual property attorney and focuses his practice on patent and intellectual property litigation.  He has obtained numerous victories for numerous high technology clients at trial and on summary judgment in patent litigation matters in the District Courts throughout the United States.  He has an Electrical Engineering degree and has litigated patent cases involving many diverse technologies, including wireless communications, CDMA, WCDMA, WiMAX, HSPA, Wi-Fi, GPS, USB modems, LTE, Video and Audio compression, CDMA2000, wireless modems, Multi-media Messaging Service (MMS), Internet systems, web-browsers for wireless devices, software, liquid crystal displays (LCD), and televisions.

Mr. Bader is also a registered patent attorney and counsels clients on intellectual property protection strategies,  prosecutes patent applications and trademark registrations before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), represents clients in patent reexaminations proceedings and trademarks oppositions before the USPTO, and conducts IP due diligence for corporate transactions and acquisitions.  He has filed and prosecuted numerous patent applications for Fortune 100 companies and small start-ups in a wide variety of technology areas, including telecommunications, modems, video compression, LCD, analog and digital electronics, communications systems, network systems, GPS, computer software, Internet, radar systems, semiconductor, electro mechanical systems, mechanical systems, signal processing, and software.

Representative Patent Litigation Experience

Intellect Wireless v. HP/Palm: Represented Hewlett-Packard and Palm in a two patent lawsuit in the Northern District of Illinois relating to sending pictures to a paging receiver.  The accused technology is multimedia messaging service (MMS).  Obtained summary judgment of no direct infringement and dismissal on behalf of our clients.

Wi-LAN v. Alcatel: Represented HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. in a multi-patent lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas relating to 3G cellular technology, including HSDPA, HSUPA, and HSPA.  After a six-day jury trial, obtained a completed defense verdict that HTC did not infringe the asserted patents and all of the asserted claims were invalid as anticipated and/or obvious.

Honeywell v. Samsung SDI and Samsung Mobile Display: Represented Samsung SDI and Samsung Mobile Display in the District of Delaware.  On summary judgment, we invalidated the asserted patent relating to LCD modules based upon the on-sale bar after most of the industry licensed the patent-in-suit.  On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed.

Intellect Wireless v. HTC: Represents HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. in a two patent lawsuit in the Northern District of Illinois relating to sending pictures to a paging receiver. The accused technology is multimedia messaging service (MMS). After a four day bench trial, the court found the patents were unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed.

Wi-LAN v. HTC: Represented HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. in a multi-patent lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas relating to Wi-Fi, LTE, Wi-MAX and CDMA2000 (EVDO Rev. A) technologies. Obtained favorable settlement.

NovelPoint Tracking v. TCT Mobile: Represented TCT Mobile in a patent lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas relating to GPS technology. Obtained favorable settlement.

Millennium Labs v. Ameritox: Represents Millennium labs in a Lanham Act action for Trade Dress infringement.

Wi-LAN v. Apple: Represented HTC America, Inc. in a multi-patent lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas relating to Wi-Fi, HSPA, LTE and CDMA2000 (EVDO Rev. A) technologies.

Novatel Wireless v. Franklin Wireless: Represented Franklin Wireless, Inc. in a four patent lawsuit in the Southern District of California relating to wireless modems, USB modems, and Wi-Fi.

Golden Bridge v. HTC: Represents HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. in a two patent lawsuit in the District of Delaware relating to WCDMA 3G technology.

Wi-LAN v. PCD: Represented Personal Communication Devices, LLC (PCD) in a two patent lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas relating to Wi-Fi and CDMA2000 technologies.  Obtained an extremely favorable settlement for PCD after filing three motions for summary judgment on PCD's behalf.

UO! IP of Delaware v. HTC: Represented Defendant, HTC, in a two patent lawsuit in Delaware relating to language translation devices.  Successfully negotiated an early license on extremely favorable terms.

Datascape, Inc. v. Kyocera Wireless: Represented Defendant, Kyocera, in a six patent infringement action in the Northern District of Georgia.  The accused technology relates to data communications and Internet access in wireless devices.

Mediatek v. Sanyo: Represented Plaintiff, Mediatek, in a three patent lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas and obtained a favorable settlement valued at over $200 million by our client.  The asserted patents related to integrated chipset solutions for conversion of television display signals, audio encoding, and compression of video and audio data in video cameras, DVD recorders and cellular phones.

Datascape, Inc. v. Sony Ericsson: Represented Defendant, Sony Ericsson, in a six patent infringement action in the Northern District of Georgia.  The accused technology relates to data communications and Internet access in wireless devices.

Apcon v. MRV Communications: Represented Defendant, MRV Communications, a leading provider of telecommunications equipment.  After Apcon threatened MRV's customers and sued MRV for patent infringement, we countersued with claims of patent misuse, inequitable conduct, and unfair competition.  Within 10 months, Apcon surrendered its patent suit by agreeing to a no payment walk-away settlement and agreed to issue a press release stating that MRV's products do not infringe any Apcon patent and that MRV's customers can conduct business without fear of reprisal from Apcon.

  • American Intellectual Property Law Association
  • San Diego Intellectual Property Law Association
  • Federal Bar Association