- Rena Andoh
- Philip Atkins-Pattenson
- Robert Beall
- Phillip Davis
- Charles Donovan
- Dana Dunwoody
- Randolph Godshall
- Steven Kramer
- Paul Malingagio
- Aaron Malo
- J. Barrett Marum
- James McShane
- James Mittermiller
- Alejandro Moreno
- Shannon Petersen
- Fred Puglisi
- Eric Raphan
- Paul Reitler
- Whitney Roy
- D. Ronald Ryland
- Betty Santohigashi
- John Stigi III
- Robert Stumpf, Jr.
- Scott Sveslosky
- Polly Towill
- Edward Vogel
Sheppard Mullin is a leader in the representation of financial services institutions. Our Financial Institutions Litigation practice consists of attorneys located throughout the firm who focus their full attention on representing institutional clients in state and federal trial and appellate courts, as well as in arbitration, mediation and other alternative dispute resolution proceedings. We provide solutions to clients at every stage of dispute resolution, from demand letters on overdue obligations to pre‑litigation negotiations and settlement through provisional remedies and litigation and appellate matters.
Our experience includes a wide variety of claims, such as disputes pertaining to:
- Class action and appellate matters
- Creditor's rights, intercreditor disputes and lender liability
- Consumer credits, bank operation and fraud claims
- Directors and officers' liability
- Discriminatory/predatory lending
- Guaranties and provisional remedies
- Banking practice and procedure claims
- RICO violations
- Uniform Commercial Code
- Will and trust contests
The Sheppard Mullin team includes seasoned trial and appellate lawyers, as well as lending, bankruptcy, commercial and real estate lawyers. Because the cases handled often involve complex credit relationships coupled with pending or potential bankruptcies and/or workouts, our litigators work closely with our bankruptcy, commercial and real estate lawyers to maximize the lender's leverage, minimize risks and obtain the best possible results.
Our securities enforcement attorneys represent investment banks, broker-dealers, investment advisors and funds, and other financial institutions. We also represent individuals who work in the financial services industry, including registered representatives, traders, bankers, supervisors and compliance professionals. The financial services sector is heavily regulated and we regularly represent clients dealing with the agencies and departments that regulate the industry, including the Department of Justice, the FBI and U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the SEC, CFTC, state Attorney General’s offices, District Attorney’s offices, state securities regulators and FINRA. We handle matters initiated by regulators, as well as internal investigations, including investigations stemming from whistle-blower allegations. We assess and handle issues ranging from regulatory reporting to remediation.
Our matters have involved numerous civil and criminal investigations involving the federal and, in some cases, state securities laws. The subject matter spans allegations involving the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934, the Investment Advisers Act, the Investment Company Act, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, insider trading, and sales practice, trading and record-keeping issues. We also handle cross-border matters and represent foreign entities subject to U.S. regulation and jurisdiction.
Our securities enforcement attorneys, who include former state and federal prosecutors and regulators, understand that most clients have ongoing relationships with their regulators. Accordingly, we balance effective advocacy with long-term relationships and credible legal positions. We frequently represent clients in matters involving multiple regulators and strategically manage parallel proceedings and evolving inquiries. Should civil litigation arise, we also have extensive civil securities litigation experience.
Creditors' Rights and Provisional Remedies
Sheppard Mullin attorneys work daily to develop solutions for creditors that create and preserve value. Provisional remedies are time sensitive and offer tactical advantages in resolving a dispute. Our attorneys move quickly to identify the right opportunity and implement the appropriate remedy based on the client's needs. Our success has ranged from obtaining writs of attachment in both state and federal proceedings to the appointment of receivers to preserve collateral to recovered indebtedness from both primary obligors and guarantors.
We are regularly retained by financial institutions to preserve loan collateral. Our attorneys have been successful in obtaining receivers for a diverse cross section of businesses and properties including, among others, commercial and industrial sites, hotels, golf courses and apartment complexes. Our guidance of the receivership process, beginning with evaluating state and local laws and ending in the ultimate disposition of the property, has provided our clients with both results and savings.
Sheppard Mullin is a recognized leader in the defense of lender liability matters. We have successfully resolved some of the largest and most complicated lender liability matters and defended multi‑million dollar claims before the courts and in arbitration proceedings. We have represented lenders in a vast array of matters, including breach of contract involving breach of commitment to fund or renew loans, oral commitments and good faith and fair dealing, as well as bad faith and breach of fiduciary duty. Our Financial Institutions Litigation team also maintains substantial expertise in litigation involving fraud and misrepresentation, negligent loan processing and administration and fraudulent or preferential transfers.
The successful representation of a variety of institutional clients at the appellate level in various state and federal courts has given Sheppard Mullin a solid reputation for excellence in acting as lead counsel throughout the appeals process. Our attorneys are prepared to effectively handle post‑trial writ petitions, post-trial motions and appeals in the California Supreme Court and the California Court of Appeal. We assist our institutional clients to analyze whether the appeals process is both the optimal legal and business decision; we do not take lightly the decision to vigorously pursue the appeals process should we believe in victory for our clients.
Sheppard Mullin attorneys understand the differences between trial and appellate work and we are very familiar with the complexities of the appeals process, which oftentimes varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Our ability to enhance the likelihood of prevailing on appeal is heightened by our fresh perspective and original ideas, which we bring to each matter.
- Los Angeles Business Journal, April 24, 2017
- November 8, 2006
- November 21, 2005
- July 20, 2005
- March 29, 2005
- March 9, 2005
- February 15, 2005
- February 1, 2005
- January 3, 2005
- December 28, 2004
- Absent Actual Knowledge Of An Inconsistency, Banks May Rely On Account Number Specified On An Incoming Wire TransferDecember 15, 2004
- December 3, 2004
- October 29, 2004
- California Municipalities May Not Levy Taxes On Certain Companies Wholly-Owned By A Financial CorporationAugust 20, 2004
- July 6, 2004
- May 14, 2004