Litigation

Litigation has been a core part of the firm's practice since 1927. Our Litigation Practice today consists of approximately 250 attorneys nationwide to serve our clients' needs. Sheppard Mullin litigators possess exceptional trial and appellate skills, in-depth knowledge of state and federal courts at all levels, and practical business judgment, all of which contribute to our consistent delivery of cost-effective results. Due to our landmark year of class action victories, Law360 selected Sheppard Mullin as a 2022 Class Action Practice Group of the Year. Read more about our historic year of class action victories on behalf of our clients here.

Sheppard Mullin's Litigation Practice involves all aspects of business and commercial litigation, including antitrust, creditors' rights, banking and financial institutions, construction, communications, general business, insurance, intellectual property, products liability, professional liability defense, real estate, environmental, securities, white collar criminal defense, and trust and estate litigation.

Our litigators represent clients in a broad spectrum of industries such as computers and information technology, financial services, aerospace, manufacturing, transportation, communications, pharmaceuticals, advertising, print and broadcast media, franchising, petroleum production and refining, real estate, insurance, construction, and food and beverage manufacturing, among others.

The attorneys in our Litigation Practice also have substantial experience in various vehicles for dispute resolution, including litigation, arbitration, and mediation.

Podcasts & Webinars

Articles

Books

Events

• Visit our Class Action Defense Strategy Law Blog
• Visit our New York Commercial Division Round Up Blog

• New York’s Long-Arm Jurisdiction Extends its Reach
  04.10.2023
• The Tides are Turning on a Wave of California Privacy Litigation
  03.08.2023
• Ninth Circuit Decision in Live Nation and Ticketmaster’s Favor Highlights Subtleties of Drafting Enforceable Arbitration Provisions
  03.01.2023
• The Commercial Division Rejects Yet Another Insured’s Claim for Coverage for Covid-Related Revenues Losses
  02.21.2023
• New York Courts Continue to Assert Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Banks
  02.03.2023
• The Ninth Circuit Further Narrows The Meaning Of ATDS Under The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
  11.29.2022
• Texas Central Wins Authority to Take Land for High-Speed Rail System
  09.27.2022
• Commercial Division to Adopt New Rule Requiring Interlineation of Responsive Pleadings
  09.08.2022
• Turning Back the Clock: DOL Proposes Previous Davis-Bacon Prevailing Wage Definition
  04.06.2022
• Judgment Creditors Beware: Moving For Contempt May Be Within Reach, But Difficult To Grasp
  04.05.2022
• FDA Boosts Protein Preemption Defense
  02.16.2022
• The Changing Landscape of Electronic Service
  02.08.2022
• Executive Order 14042 Survival Guide
  11.16.2021
• Are Flavor Cases Fizzling? Two More Courts Grant Motions to Dismiss
  11.15.2021
• Class Action Waivers Redux: Ninth Circuit Upholds Arbitration Provision Delegating Enforceability Determination to Arbitrator
  09.22.2021
• Illinois Appellate Court Affirms 5-Year Statute of Limitations Period for Certain BIPA Claims
  09.20.2021
• New York Courts Continue to Enforce Broad General Releases, Even When Claims are Unforeseeable at the Time of Contract Execution
  07.29.2021
• Scabby Survives Another Trip to the NLRB: Board Reaffirms Rat-and-Banner Displays Targeting Neutral Businesses Are Permissible
  07.29.2021
• Signing Contracts as a Representative May Lead to Individual Liability
  07.21.2021
• Supreme Court Addresses Class Action Standing in Ramirez Case: Requires “Concrete” Injury for Article III Standing for Class Members
  07.12.2021
• The Second Department Weighs in on Tolling vs. Suspension of Statutes of Limitation Pursuant to Governor Cuomo’s COVID-era Executive Orders
  07.06.2021
• Eighth Circuit Holds Rule 23(b)(3)’s Predominance Requirement Not Met in Securities Fraud Action Against Brokerage Firm
  05.05.2021
• Albany Commercial Division Looks Beyond “First-In-Time” Analysis When Considering Dismissal Pursuant to CPLR § 3211(a)(4)
  04.14.2021
• The U.S. Supreme Court Limits TCPA Liability By Narrowly Interpreting ATDS
  04.05.2021
• Build Me A Building As Fast As You Can
  03.09.2021
• Landmark Contractor Licensing Case Limits Disgorgement Remedy in California
  09.29.2020
• California Construction in the Time of Covid-19
  03.25.2020
• Last, but NOT Least: Why You Should Take a Closer Look at Your Next Indemnification Clause
  01.09.2020
• Breaking with Tradition, The Current NLRB is on a Rulemaking Tear: Election Procedures, Recognition Bar, and 9(a) Collective Bargaining Relationships
  08.13.2019
• Labor Development Impacting Developers, Contractors, and Landowners
  06.04.2019