Brooke Miller

Overview

Brooke has nearly 20 years of experience helping her clients successfully navigate land use planning, zoning, entitlements, environmental, local government and special districts law to expedite and defend their development projects.

Areas of Practice

Brooke partners with clients to develop strategic approaches to land use entitlements. She leverages her expertise in state and local laws to help clients statewide secure development permits for housing, mixed-use, commercial, energy storage and other projects, minimizing risk whenever possible. Brooke has many years of experience working directly with agency staff and advising and presenting before local government officials at the county, city and special district levels. She also successfully defends her clients in litigation under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Subdivision Map Act and the California Planning and Zoning Law, including in published appellate decisions from the 2^nd and 6^th District Courts of Appeal.

In addition to her land use and environmental law practice, Brooke has experience practicing under the Cortese-Knox-Herzberg Local Government Reorganization Act, the Coastal Act and the California Global Warming Solutions Act, among other laws. She also has extensive experience in government contracting and public works.

Prior to joining Sheppard Mullin, Brooke practiced in both the private and public sector. After almost a decade in private practice, primarily representing cities and special districts including water, transportation and fire districts, Brooke joined the Santa Cruz County Office of County Counsel as Assistant County Counsel representing the Planning Commission, Planning Department, Department of Public Works, Santa Cruz County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), County Sanitation Districts and Regional Transportation Commission.

Brooke later joined the San Diego County Counsel’s office, advising the County Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission on CEQA compliance and land use entitlements and working closely with County Planning & Development Services and Sustainability staff on the Climate Action Plan update and Countywide CEQA thresholds of significance, including the County’s VMT-based transportation threshold. Brooke also defended the County against lawsuits under CEQA and related land use laws in collaboration with counsel for real parties in interest.

Brooke has been recognized as a San Diego Daily Transcript Young Attorneys Award Finalist and received a Litigation Award from the County Counsels’ Association of California. Brooke is an Expert Contributor for the California Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) CEQA Portal and participates in the Urban Land Institute San Diego-Tijuana Womens’ Leadership Initiative.

Experience

Successfully defended the City of Los Angeles’s approval of a housing development in CEQA litigation on behalf of real parties in interest in the published case of Guerrero et al. v. City of Los Angeles (2024) __ Cal. App. 5^th __, holding petitioners’ CEQA claims were untimely under the Statute of Limitations triggered by the first project approval.
Achieved City Council approval of a long-term contract and sign regulation exception for the installation of digital wayfinding kiosks in Downtown San Diego over opposition from adverse interest groups.
Worked extensively to obtain federal reauthorization and funding for the Pajaro River Levee Project, an approximately $400 million flood control project to protect vulnerable agricultural communities in Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties.
Successfully defended the County of Santa Cruz against litigation under the Subdivision Map Act challenging final map approval for a multiuse project with retail space, a village green and residential units including deed-restricted affordable units.
Successfully defended the County of Santa Cruz in CEQA litigation in the published case of Aptos Council v. County of Santa Cruz (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 266 (cert. den.), upholding the County’s approval of Zoning Code changes against a CEQA challenge based on segmentation claims.