- J.D., West Virginia University, Editor in Chief, The West Virginia Law Review, 2014, Order of the Coif
- M.B.A., West Virginia University, 2014
- B.A., College of William and Mary, 2011
- District of Columbia
- New York
- United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Imad S. Matini is an associate in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm's Washington, D.C. office.
Areas of Practice
Mr. Matini has significant litigation experience before diverse decision-making authorities, including state and federal courts, as well as arbitral tribunals.
His representations have involved a wide array of complex and high-stakes litigation matters, and have ranged from commercial disputes to cases involving statutory, international law, trade secret, communications, and administrative law issues. Mr. Matini's matters have also been reported in the media.
Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Matini clerked for two federal judges: the Honorable Stephanie D. Thacker for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and the Honorable Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. for the Northern District of West Virginia.
While in law school, Mr. Matini served as Editor-in-Chief of his law review, was a member of the Tax Moot Court team, and worked on behalf of indigent clients as part of his school’s Supreme Court Clinic. Mr. Matini’s article, Distinctions with a Difference, has also been published in the University of Tennessee Law Review.
FCC Law Blog Posts
- "Back To The Future: FCC Returns To Light Touch Regulation Of The Internet," June 13, 2018
- "Lucia Is Likely To Have Little Impact On Waning FCC Adjudications," July 17, 2018
Distinctions With A Difference: Why Proper Rule 59(e) Motions Should Not Be Subject To “Second Or Successive” Habeas Analysis, 84 Tenn. L. R. 1 (2016), available at https://tennesseelawreviewdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/distinctions-with-a-difference.pdf
- New York Times, August 2, 2018