Print PDF

Overdraft Fees: Barbarians (and Regulations) at the Gate


You can almost hear them now, rattling their spears outside every bank in the state. They are the class action barbarians, and they’re here to sue you. About what? Overdraft fees.

Several class action suits have been filed alleging unfair practices concerning overdraft fees. One such suit - a $300 million action against Wells Fargo - is already in trial and closing arguments have been scheduled for July 9. If the plaintiffs succeed against Wells Fargo, financial institutions can expect a flood of “me too” class actions targeting other players in the industry. Indeed, just in the last few months, several other banks have been sued in copycat suits.

So, what’s the dispute? The most controversial practice is resequencing - that is, the practice of deducting same-day debit card transactions from account balances starting with the largest transaction first (rather than deducting the debits in the order they were made). The result of resequencing is that a customer may be charged several overdraft fees on the same day, rather than being charged a single fee (as might be the result if the debits were deducted in the order they were made).

Other allegedly unfair practices challenged by the overdraft fee class actions include (i) failing to provide customers adequate notice of their right to opt out of overdraft protection plans, (ii) failing to provide customers notice - at the ATM or point of sale - that a specific transaction would result in an overdraft (thus giving the customer a chance to avoid the overdraft fee), and (iii) misleading advertising of overdraft protection plans.

What can financial institutions do to protect themselves? Here are a few tips:

  1. Ensure compliance with the impending revisions to Regulation E concerning customer consent and “opt in” protections for overdraft protection plans. These new regulations go into effect on July 1 (see below for more details).
  2. Check your overdraft practices against the Treasury Department’s “best practices” guidelines for overdraft protection plans. Deviations Menu from these best practices will only provide fodder for class action suits.
  3. Consider revising or abandoning overdraft protection practices that create liability risk. For example, Chase announced last September that it would begin processing debit transactions in the order received, rather than resequencing them by size. And in March of this year, Bank of America announced that it would discontinue overdraft fees on debit transactions.

Regulation Update

In response to public demand for more consumer protection regarding overdraft fees, on November 17, 2009, the Federal Reserve System (the “Board”) adopted final rules amending Regulation E (12 C.F.R. § 205.1., et seq.) The amended Regulation E helps consumers understand how overdraft services operate and ensures that consumers have the opportunity to limit the overdraft costs associated with ATM and one-time debit card transactions. The amendments - which go into effect on July 1, 2010 - only apply to overdraft fees imposed on ATM and one-time debit card transactions; they do not apply to checking, ACH, and recurring debit card transactions.

Here are the high points of the new rules:

  1. Financial institutions may not charge consumers fees for paying overdrafts on ATM and one-time debit card transactions that overdraw on the account, unless a consumer affirmatively consents, or opts in, to the overdraft services for those types of transactions. The opt-in requirements applies to all consumers, including existing and new account holders.
  2. Financial institutions must provide consumers a written notice that explains the financial institution’s overdraft services, including fees associated with the service, and the consumer’s choices.
  3. The consumer must opt in, or affirmatively consent, to the financial institution’s overdraft services before overdraft fees may be assessed on the consumer’s account for the financial institution’s honoring overdrafts.
  4. Financial institutions may not tie or condition the payment of overdrafts for checks and other transactions to the consumer opting into the overdraft service for ATM and one-time debit card transactions.
  5. Financial institutions cannot discriminate against consumers who do not opt in. Financial institutions must provide consumers who do not opt in with the same account terms, conditions, and features (including pricing) that they provide to consumers who do opt in.


Jump to Page

By scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies as described in our Cookie and Advertising Policy. If you do not wish to accept cookies from our website, or would like to stop cookies being stored on your device in the future, you can find out more and adjust your preferences here.