Photo of Paul A. Werner

Paul A. Werner

Washington, DC
F: +1.202.747.3817


  • J.D., Vanderbilt University Law School, Editor in Chief, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment Law & Practice, 2002, Order of the Coif
  • B.A., University of California, Los Angeles, 1999, summa cum laude
  • Law clerk to The Honorable Karen LeCraft Henderson of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
  • District of Columbia
  • Virginia
  • United States Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
  • U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
Thought Leadership


Paul Werner is a partner in the firm’s Business Trials Practice Group and resident in the Washington D.C. office. He is a member of the firm's Compensation Committee. 

Areas of Practice

Paul is a seasoned first-chair litigator, whose prodigious representations over the past decade have been before diverse decision-making authorities, including all levels of courts and administrative tribunals, federal and state, as well as arbitral tribunals, and spanned a wide range of complex litigation matters. These matters have run the gamut from “bet the company” commercial disputes to controversies involving statutory, constitutional, communications, energy, environmental, insurance, intellectual property, false advertising, trade secrets, privacy, and administrative law issues.

Paul has extensive experience representing cable operators, telecommunications, and other broadband providers in matters involving communications law issues, including local franchising, PEG programming, rights-of-way, pole attachments and infrastructure deployment, and a host of other related issues. He has represented providers on these issues in state and federal courts and participated in rulemakings and adjudications before the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”).

Paul also regularly defends a diverse array of companies against putative class actions, particularly suits involving claims of unfair competition, state consumer protection statutes, and products liability. Paul has represented major automobile manufacturers against putative class actions alleging design defects and other consumer protection claims. He is currently representing a named defendant in a series of putative class actions that have been consolidated in an MDL seeking billions in damages in connection with the promotion, sale, and distribution of opioid medications. See In re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation (1:17-md-02804). And recently, Paul also successfully represented an association of communications providers in defeating certification of a putative class of landowners seeking damages for alleged unauthorized “telecommunications” use of easements they had granted to an electric utility, and is currently defending the trial court’s decision on appeal.

Paul also represents diverse clients in domestic and international arbitration matters. Paul recently represented a Korean satellite telecommunications provider in complex and high-stakes international arbitration proceedings, including lengthy evidentiary hearings, stemming from a dispute the Wall Street Journal called an “outer-space turf war.”

Paul is additionally experienced in representing companies in governmental and internal investigations. He has represented clients in criminal and civil investigations, including investigations arising under the False Claim Act, the Anti-Kickback Act, and the FCC E-Rate program.

His practice includes significant trial and appellate experience. In recent years, Paul has tried multiple disputes to judgment. He also recently assisted with a lengthy trial in federal court involving false advertising claims that resulted in a favorable jury verdict. Paul also regularly represents clients in state and federal appellate courts, including the United States Supreme Court. Paul's matters are regularly reported in the media, including Law360.

Paul is dedicated to pro bono representations and public interest litigation. On behalf of a community organization, Paul successfully obtained an appellate decision overturning a trial court decision that had upheld a planning board's approval of a commercial water bottling operation in an environmentally-protected area with trailheads into the Catskill mountains.  And he is currently representing an environmental organization in federal court litigation arising under the Environmental Species Act, as well as a separate not-for-profit organization in unrelated environmental litigation concerning the Bristol Bay region of Southwest Alaska.


  • "Highly Recommended" for Media, Technology and Telecoms, Legal 500, 2012-2019
  • Washington D.C. Super Lawyer, 2014-2016


  • Obtained unanimous victory on issue of first impression with broad implication for cable industry in case briefed and argued before Texas Supreme Court. Time Warner Cable Texas LLC v. CPS Energy, No. 17-0840, --- S.W.3d ---, 2019 WL 2147257 (Tex. May 17, 2019)
  • Won a preliminary injunction in favor of nearly a dozen communications providers that led to favorable resolution of federal court litigation against the City of Baltimore involving Section 253 of the federal Communications Act.
  • Successfully represented the California Cable and Telecommunications Association in defeating certification of a class of statewide landowners seeking injunctive relief and damages for alleged wrongful "telecommunications” use of easements they granted to an electric utility.
  • Won summary judgment in favor of a cable operator in long-running federal court litigation brought by a local franchising authority claiming millions of dollars in damages for an alleged breach of the franchise agreement. (Mecklenburg County v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse P’ship, 2010 WL 391279 (W.D.N.C. 2010))
  • Won summary judgment in favor of a cable operator in federal court litigation brought by local franchising authorities alleging violation of Public, Educational, and Governmental obligations
  • Defended cable operator through a weeks' long trial of a state court action brought by an investor-owned electric utility claiming the operator owed millions of dollars in back pole attachment fees for allegedly providing "telecommunications services"
  • Defended an international automobile manufacturer in coordinated putative class actions involving products liability and state consumer protection statutes based on allegations of defective alignment systems and consequent tire wear. (In Re LR3 Litigation (MDL 2008))

Thought Leadership


Class Action Defense Strategy Blog

Eye on Privacy Blog Posts

FCC Law Blog Posts

Media Mentions

Speaking Engagements

  • "CMS’ Medicare Advantage Overpayment Rule Takes a Permanent Vacation: What’s Next for Payors and Providers Alike," Sheppard Mullin Healthcare Webinar, October 16, 2018


  • Federal Communications Bar Association
  • The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit